Technology Archives - Racecar Engineering https://www.racecar-engineering.com/category/articles/technology/ The leading motorsport technology magazine | F1, Le Mans, Formula Student, Super GT Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:57:27 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.3 Forze IX Hydrogen Racing Fuel Cell Racer https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/forzeix/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/forzeix/#respond Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:57:27 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=611842 Stewart Mitchell investigates the Forze IX, a hydrogen fuel cell racer developed with Delft University of Technology’s pioneering enigneering students.

The post Forze IX Hydrogen Racing Fuel Cell Racer appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
Hydrogen is an abundant element when it comes to fuelling propulsion. Its potential to replace liquid fuels in internal combustion engines is an exciting prospect for many car makers, and the drivers for its implementation in that regime are vast. However, there is another significant opportunity for hydrogen in vehicle propulsion in the form of hydrogen fuel cell electric power.

A team of Delft University of Technology technical department students studying to become tomorrow’s engineers have designed, built, and raced a hydrogen fuel cell electric-powered Prototype to demonstrate the possibilities for hydrogen in motorsports, mobility and more.

The team, called Forze Hydrogen Racing, was set up to accelerate the marketing, activation and visibility of hydrogen and the technology inside fuel cell cars. The result is a collaboration of academic programmes and industrial partner-engineered design, providing a laboratory environment to develop hydrogen fuel cell technology under rigorous racing conditions.

Forze Hydrogen Racing was founded in 2007 and started by putting small fuel cells on a go-kart. The latest car, the Forze IX, is a full-scale Prototype racer that currently competes in an Open GT racing class in The Netherlands. It is considered a breakthrough in hydrogen fuel cell electric car performance.

Fuel cell operation

The Forze IX is an electric-powered Prototype racecar with a supercapacitor accumulator, and two independent EKPO fuel cell systems that produce its electricity. The sensitive operation of the hydrogen fuel cell makes designing one for the racecar application challenging.

The Forze IX represents an entirely new concept in racecar propulsion, a dual fuel cell electric racer

 

The oxygen required comes from the outside air, which is scooped in from the main inlet on the roof and fed to the two cathode systems. Before the air can reach the fuel cell, it must be conditioned to remove contaminants and rainwater. So it is run through filters designed with one of the team’s partners, Donaldson, before being compressed by an electrical turbo-compressor from Fisher Spindle.

Due to this compression, the air heats up so, before entering the cathode, it passes through an intercooler to cool it down. Compressing the air also enables energy recuperation from the exhaust flow, which significantly increases system efficiency.

Finally, Fumatech humidifiers moisten the air so as not to dry out the fuel cell.

The compressed, intercooled and humidified air then enters the cathode inside the fuel cell. Both cathode systems consume as much as 16kg of air per minute.

At the anode, hydrogen molecules are split into atoms and stripped of their electrons, leaving a proton that needs to pass through the fuel cell membrane. Meanwhile, the hydrogen’s electron is forced through an electrical circuit. This electron movement is current that the car can use as drive power directly at the motors and power systems, or to charge the accumulator.

At the cathode, the proton bonds with the oxygen in the air and re-combines with the electron to form a water molecule, which is then exhausted from the system using excess air.

‘What makes the car truly unique is that it runs on two separate and independent fuel cell systems,’ explains Abel van Beest, team manager of Forze Hydrogen Racing. ‘Only a few experiments have been done in the past with dual-engine cars, and this is a first for fuel cells.

‘Running on a dual fuel cell system like this one has several advantages. Starting from redundancy can help in case of a partial system failure and reduce engineering risk as one system can be developed and tested before producing the second one.’

The fuel cells provide a continuous 240kW.

The fuel cell is a sophisticated onboard electricity generation device

‘The two EKPO fuel cells are very power dense and are therefore a great match for a powerful, tightly packaged car,’ van Beest continues. ‘The two fuel cells simultaneously operate under independent deployment strategies to provide the most efficient performance for any part of a track, and allow our engineers to develop and iterate upgrades much faster.’

Hydrogen management

The total volume of hydrogen on board amounts to about 8.5kg, which is stored in four tanks at 700 times atmospheric pressure (bar). From the tanks, it is transported through high-pressure and vibration-resistant tubing from Parker to a pressure regulator that drops the pressure of the hydrogen.

The next stop is a hydrogen control system, custom developed by Forze’s fuel cell engineers, in collaboration with Burkert.

This system consistently provides the fuel cell with the exact amount of hydrogen for the demand. In some conditions, excess hydrogen is delivered to the fuel cell to gain more performance and lifetime. A recirculation system was developed using a custom component called the ejector so as not to waste the hydrogen that comes back out of the fuel cell. The ejector is a passive device used to sustain hydrogen recirculation to the fuel cell, specifically on the anode side, without power.

‘The ejector, in essence, can be viewed as a pump, a device that increases the pressure of a fluid to overcome the frictional losses associated with mass transport,’ explains India van Doornen, chief engineer at Forze Hydrogen Racing. ‘Within the control of the various mass flows to and from the fuel cell, the ejector’s job is to maintain the hydrogen flow on the anode side of the fuel cell, which a recirculation pump would typically fulfil.

‘However, a recirculation pump requires considerable amounts of power, usually in the order of several kilowatts, to achieve the required pressure lift,’ he continues. ‘This power would come from that produced by the fuel cell system and is directly consumed by the systems supporting its operation, generating parasitic losses. The ejector, on the other hand, reduces the parasitic losses of the fuel cell system by tapping into another energy source: the potential energy stored as pressure within the hydrogen storage tanks.’

The filtration, compression and cooling system for the air side of the hydrogen fuel cell

 

The stored hydrogen must be returned to near atmospheric pressure before the fuel cell can use it, and the ejector system exploits this potential energy to increase the hydrogen pressure in the anode recirculation loop. The hydrogen feed is throttled to coincide with demand, and this process is not used to produce useful output.

‘The ejector increases the pressure of the gases in the fuel cell anode recirculation loop by throttling the hydrogen to a pressure several bar above the final desired pressure,’ confirms van Doornen. ‘The hydrogen from the storage system is accelerated through the ejector’s convergent nozzle geometry, which decreases the fluid’s static pressure.’

The ejector geometry means the pressure of the fluid leaving the nozzle is lower than the pressure of the fluid in the recirculation loop. As a result, the hydrogen in the recirculation loop is entrained because of the negative pressure gradient. The gases in the anode loop are therefore accelerated and mixed with the hydrogen from the storage system at a high velocity. At this point, a lot of the fluid’s energy is kinetic.

The flow is fed through a diffuser to transfer this kinetic energy back into potential energy in the form of pressure, and the ejector’s geometry increases the pressure of the fluid relative to the entrained flow.

The Forze engineers optimised this component using flow simulations, with help from FTXT. The car features an accumulator of supercapacitor cells from Musashi, enabling onboard electrical storage with ultra-fast charge and discharge to make the fuel cell system efficient and practical for racing.

The hydrogen tanks shown as positioned in the chassis. Around 8.5kg of hydrogen are stored, at 700 times atmospheric pressure

 

Another partner, SciMo, provides the four lightweight and power-dense electric motors that allow Forza IX to have a combined motor torque equivalent to that of a Lamborghini Huracán. The SciMo motor units also enable the Forze IX to regenerate as much energy in one braking zone as a Formula 1 car can generate in an entire lap. 

‘Each motor is connected to its custom gearbox and drivetrain so the wheels can spin at different speeds, allowing for torque vectoring,’ explains van Doornen. ‘When the car approaches a corner, it needs to decelerate. A significant part of this deceleration is achieved by regenerative braking using the four electric motors to charge the accumulator. When the car is most power sensitive, at corner exit, besides the fuel cells working on maximum power, the accumulator can be quickly discharged to the motors, delivering the total output of 600kW to the wheels.’

System integration

Creating a lot of power always comes with a lot of heat, since no system is 100 per cent efficient. As such, the Forze IX is heavily cooled to maintain performance. Despite the significant new technical innovations onboard, the cooling presented some of the biggest design challenges for the project.

The hydrogen fuel cell and supercapacitor accumulator run at very low temperatures compared to an internal combustion engine but, because the temperature difference between the powertrain and the outside air is small, it is hard to cool it using outside air.

The car is therefore fitted with five radiators spread over the car to address the cooling requirements, which the Forze team cooling engineers designed with partner, PWR. Pierburg pumps drive coolant through the system at a flow rate of up to 460l/min.

Cooling is critical, and the Forze IX features five radiators to thermally manage the dual fuel cell, supercapacitor electric powertrain

 

To have enough airflow through these radiators to exchange the heat with the coolant, the Forze IX needed specialised aerodynamic bodywork to accommodate its thermal requirements, while also maintaining adequate performance and efficiency. The Forze IX aerodynamics engineers designed the car’s carbon fibre bodywork, which was produced with partner, Airborne.

‘The Forze IX’s shape is the result of over 500 iterations of airflow simulations to optimise the aerodynamics for the application,’ highlights van Doornen. ‘The mass flow of air through the radiators is 190kg/min, and the Forze IX still generates 1200kg of downforce at top speed. Even with higher cooling requirements than other Prototype cars, the Forze IX has good aerodynamic efficiency with a lift-over-drag ratio of around 4:1.’

The front of the chassis is a carbon fibre monocoque construction, built for driver and systems protection, with integrated mountings at the rear to accommodate power unit systems. The monocoque features a frontal extension to include the front drivetrain, while the back houses the accumulator and mounts for the central subframe, all while weighing just under 100kg.

The car’s body was iterated over 300 times using various CAE solvers to ensure seamless integration of the powertrain systems.

‘The central subframe mounted behind the monocoque houses most of the critical systems in the car, such as the fuel cells and the main tank,’ notes van Doornen. ‘It was optimised for stiffness and crash protection, while also accommodating the rear subframe mounting. The rear subframe consists of a structural motor and gearbox housing designed to attach to the rear suspension and a rear wing support structure to deal with those loads.’

The two fuel cells sit behind the driver’s safety cell, mounted on the central subframe

 

Forze Hydrogen Racing’s vehicle dynamics engineers designed the car’s double wishbone suspension.

‘The tricky part about designing the suspension was the little space we had to work with in the car,’ notes van Doornen. ‘We needed to ensure the forces were translated properly from the ground to the chassis and provide optimal road handling while tightly packaged.

‘Our suspension features high-quality bearings from SKF that ensure a smooth and low friction movement.’

Using driving simulations, the Forze engineering team identified all the forces and shocks occurring within the suspension while racing. A damper package from Koni was then chosen as the optimal solution for the car, providing the driver with the proper feedback from the interaction between the car and the road.

Control systems

The Forza IX is a complex machine, with a great many systems interacting, so it needed a brain to activate and accurately control all those systems. A custom power distribution system was therefore designed to manage the energy flow from the fuel cells to the four electric motors, two compressors and all other power devices.

‘The function of the brain is taken up by our embedded system, which has a central processing unit and distributed sensing and activation units that operate like a nervous system,’ explains van Doornen. ‘All the embedded systems are prototypes, with many custom components and experimental samples from the automotive industry.’

The embedded central control systems monitor, protect and control all the sub-systems in the car.

To help do this, the team developed a component called the supervisor node. This monitors the hydrogen tanks and refuelling system, checks high-voltage electronics and performs critical shutdown safely. It can take up all safety-critical features and operate them during a system failure or power loss.

Sensors and control units throughout the car run the car

 

The state of the car is constantly monitored by over 400 sensors provided by team partner, Kistler. That’s more sensors than on a current Formula 1 car.

‘The various sensors accurately measure a large variety of parameters from which thousands of calculations of the state of critical systems are made to operate the car safely and in the most performant manner,’ notes van Doornen. ‘Measurement of many parameters are needed to learn about the systems since the team is working with all-new technology that has never been benchmarked before.’

The team’s electrical engineers have also designed custom telemetry system hardware that collects sensor data and communicates it to the central control unit of the car. From there, commands are communicated to the external hardware and relays telemetry, and to all other electrical components throughout the car when necessary.

The wiring harness and the central control unit, which has enough processing power to run all the control systems and process all the data, were designed in cooperation with partner, Fokker, while the control algorithms are written by Forze control system engineers, and dictate at all times what the controllable components in the car have to do.

‘Due to its unique hydrogen electric design, the Forze IX consists of a unique collection of specialised electrical devices. To integrate those into a robust and embedded system, our software engineers had to design a completely custom and extensive software structure,’ explains van Doornen. ‘It features low-level codes to interface specific devices, and high-level implementation for system level error handling.’

The supercapacitor accumulator is situated alongside the driver, while the power electronics sit in front of the rear axle. The motors are alongside each axle, delivering torque to the driveshafts via bespoke gearboxes

 

As it is not enough that the car itself knows what’s happening during a race, the trackside engineers also need to have all critical information to hand to spot mechanical or electrical problems whilst the car is on track, or run a power strategy at a particular moment in the race. Therefore, the Forza IX features telemetry using UHF, 4G and Wi-Fi systems. The car can transmit all the necessary data at various data rates depending on the distance from the pit wall. To make telemetry even more convenient, the Forze team, together with IBM, are setting up cloud-based telemetry for easy data storage and analysis.

‘The Forze IX is built to keep growing and innovating, so that is what we are going to do,’ states van Beest. ‘In the future, Forze aims to shift towards endurance racing. We believe that is where the power of hydrogen lies.’

The post Forze IX Hydrogen Racing Fuel Cell Racer appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/forzeix/feed/ 0
Hybrid Issues Harm BMW’s Daytona 24h Challenge https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/hybrid-issues-harm-bmws-daytona-24h-challenge/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/hybrid-issues-harm-bmws-daytona-24h-challenge/#respond Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:56:41 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=611236 Hybrid system failures plagued the BMW M Hybrid LMDh/GTP debut at Daytona 24 hours.

The post Hybrid Issues Harm BMW’s Daytona 24h Challenge appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

598 days after the BMW Group board decision and 188 days after the roll-out, the BMW M Hybrid V8 completed its first endurance test at the 24 Hours of Daytona (USA). The season-opener in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship at the Daytona International Speedway marked the start of a new era for prototype motor racing. It was the first time hybrid-driven LMDh cars competed in the GTP class, meaning that the BMW M Hybrid V8 completed its baptism of fire under race conditions. Philipp Eng (AUT), Augusto Farfus (BRA), Marco Wittmann (GER) and Colton Herta (USA) gave a consistent performance in the #24 car. The quartet was within striking distance of a podium finish for some time before issues with the hybrid system resulted in a brake problem in the race’s final quarter that cost a substantial amount of time. Final driver Philipp Eng crossed the finish line in sixth place.

The #25 car had to be pushed to the pits to make an extended repair stop in the BMW M Team RLL garage after about an hour. A number of components had to be replaced after the failure of the hybrid powertrain – a common component used by all manufacturers. That took around two and a half hours and meant that Connor De Phillippi (USA), Nick Yelloly (GBR), Sheldon van der Linde (RSA) and Colton Herta, who was racing in both cars, were forced to drive right at the back of the field. They still managed to finish the race, chalking up kilometres of testing that will prove valuable considering the short preparation period and the remainder of the season ahead.

The Board of Management of the BMW Group gave the green light to the development of an LMDh car on 10th June 2021. Just about one year later, on 25th July 2022, the BMW M Hybrid V8 completed its roll-out in Varano de‘ Melegari (ITA). The development and testing stages of the complex hybrid car were correspondingly brief, making preparations for the race debut particularly challenging.

Andreas Roos, Head of BMW M Motorsport, said, ‘As expected, the 24 Hours of Daytona proved to be a great challenge but provided valuable experience. Of course, we would have liked better results. It was looking good for the #24 car for a long period. We focussed on retaining concentration, driving consistently and making no mistakes. The drivers, the BMW M Motorsport engineers and BMW M Team RLL managed to do that. Unfortunately, it was primarily the common components of the hybrid system that caused us problems which we had to analyse together – especially with the #25 car, as we fell back a long way after having to replace numerous components early in the race. It is a real shame that our hard work over the past weeks and months was not rewarded with a better result. Nonetheless, I am proud and grateful that we managed to make extensive progress with the project in such a short space of time and crossed the finish line with both BMW M Hybrid V8s. Our ambition is to record wins and podium finishes. We are extremely motivated to draw the right conclusions from this race and come back even stronger at Sebring. Congratulations to the Acura team on the first win of the new GTP era. Sadly, our teams also endured some bad luck with the BMW M4 GT3 in the GTD classes. Due to the classification, they had a tough job from the start and also suffered some technical problems. However, we will analyse these in detail and do it better next time.’

ENDS

The post Hybrid Issues Harm BMW’s Daytona 24h Challenge appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/hybrid-issues-harm-bmws-daytona-24h-challenge/feed/ 0
Acura ARX-06 LMDh Prototype Development Story https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/acura-arx-06-lmdh-prototype/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/acura-arx-06-lmdh-prototype/#respond Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:02:43 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=610412 Acura Motorsports released the first images of the company's 2023 hybrid Acura ARX-06 LMDh prototype for the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship.

The post Acura ARX-06 LMDh Prototype Development Story appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

The latest in a line of successful Acura endurance racing prototypes, the ARX-06 features Acura-specific bodywork and aerodynamics based around an all-new ORECA LMDh chassis, which utilizes an electrified hybrid power unit featuring an equally new, bespoke twin-turbocharged 2.4 liter V6 internal combustion engine designed, developed and manufactured by Honda Performance Development [HPD] the racing arm for Acura Motorsports in North America. In preparation for the 2023 IMSA season, Acura and HPD work on the prototype race car ahead of its premiere at the 2023 Rolex 24 at Daytona.

Acura ARX-06 Origin Story

The ARX-06 was developed by Honda Performance Development (HPD) in Santa Clarita California to compete in the IMSA Sportscar Championship and the FIA World Endurance Championship (WEC) in the LMDh category. Its nomenclature derives from Acura Racing eXperimental, generation 6.

Acura Motorsports programs have been integral to the Acura brand since its launch in 1986. It previously campaigned the ARX-05 DPi in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and won the team, manufacturer, and driver championships in 2019 and 2020. It also won the Rolex 24 at Daytona in 2021 and ’22, including a 1-2 finish at the 2022 twice-around-the-clock endurance classic. The exterior styling of the ARX-06 prototype race car was led by the Acura Design Studio in Los Angeles, Calif., in conjunction with Honda Performance Development and ORECA.

Engine supplier for ARX-06, HPD, has a rich heritage of creating, manufacturing, and supporting Honda Racing and Acura Motorsports customers since 1993. It leads all of Honda and Acura’s high-performance racing programs in North America and specialises in the design and development of powertrain, chassis, electronics, and technology and race support. HPD delivers parts and race support to Honda and Acura amateur and professional motorsports racers and is expanding its palette of racing programs to make Honda racing products available to all racing disciplines, from karting and Quarter Midgets to the highest levels of professional racing.

Honda Performance Development built an all-new, 2.4-litre, twin-turbo engine for its ARX-06 LMDh. Regarding the choice to produce this engine, HPD president and technical director David Salters said, ‘We have some brilliant vehicle dynamicists, and we did a lot of simulations to understand what we needed. We already had a nice DPi engine, so the easy choice would have been to use the DPi engine, except it’s heavier and bigger. We thought we could do better, though. We read the rule book a lot to work out what was required to make the best car. The point of making the decision on the engine came over Christmas 2021.

‘When you start something like this, you ask how do you make the best racecar that you can? You make the lightest, most compact racecar you can and you start with the basics – make it light and close to the ground. There’s still a lot to be said for that. With the 2.4-litre V6 engine we went for, the question was can we make the power while also making it survive? We sent all the groups off to figure out what was their best thing, and then we sat down, had a three-hour meeting and decided we would use this engine.’ one of our simulation guys went away and simulated how to make the power with the combustion loads low, so he worked all Christmas and came back on the 2nd of January [2022] with a 100-page report.

‘We then set the guys off to do the best packaging, in the most compact way we can.’
HPD also did all the software for the AR-06. Salters noted, ‘We do that all in house, and we do our own software, so we do the powertrain control, hybrid control, energy management and vehicle control, brake-by-wire system and we have an in-house group that sorts all that out. We also have a vehicle dynamics group, so we have our own Driver-In-the-Loop simulator, so it goes through DIL, then HIL, then here, we write code in the truck. We are encouraged to do that. that is the lovely bit about working for Honda.’

ENDS

The post Acura ARX-06 LMDh Prototype Development Story appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/acura-arx-06-lmdh-prototype/feed/ 0
Porsche 963 LMDh/GTP Hybrid Prototype Technical Insight https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/porsche-963-lmdh-insight/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/porsche-963-lmdh-insight/#respond Wed, 25 Jan 2023 18:31:45 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=611184 IMSA and WEC's LMDh/GTP Prototype class debuts at the Daytona 24 in January 2023. Here's a technical insight into the Porsche 963 LMDh/GTP Hybrid Prototype.

The post Porsche 963 LMDh/GTP Hybrid Prototype Technical Insight appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

The prospect of fielding a vehicle in both the FIA World Endurance Championship (WEC) and the North American IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship proved to be enticing enough for Porsche AG’s executive board, who, on 16 December 2020, announced its commitment to developing an LMDh prototype for racing from January 2023.

Less than five months later, Porsche divulged its close partnership with Team Penske. The new Porsche Penske Motorsport team for international racing was born. The squad operates out of two locations: The IMSA headquarters is in the American team’s home of Mooresville, North Carolina, with the WEC operations run from Mannheim, Germany.

After an active testing phase for the new prototypes throughout 2022, the new Porsche 963 makes its official race debut at the 24 Hours of Daytona in the US state of Florida (28/29 January 2023). Prior to this, the hybrid vehicle covered more than 33,000 kilometres at tests and the so-called Roar at Daytona.

Daytona: Rolex 24 at Daytona on January, 20, 2023. Credit: Juergen Tap

Chassis: LMP2 basis from Multimatic with the iconic Porsche brand identity

The regulations stipulate that all new vehicles for the LMDh category must be based on an LMP2 chassis. Four potential partners are available for such a project: Multimatic, Oreca, Dallara and Ligier. After an in-depth evaluation, Porsche made the call to work with Multimatic.

As the largest of the four LMP2 manufacturers, the automotive technology company based in Toronto (Canada) also contributes components for the Porsche 911 RSR, the Porsche 911 GT3 R, and Porsche 911 GT3 Cup. In addition to the existing business relationship, the enormous production capacities also spoke in favour of Multimatic – a critical factor given that customers will also race the Porsche 963 on both sides of the Atlantic in its first year of competition.

‘The regulations give us a performance window,’ Christian Eifrig, technical project manager of the Porsche 963, explains. ‘In terms of downforce and lap times, the vehicle must remain within a defined performance range as prescribed by the regulations. This is the only way for the sport’s governing bodies to equalise the cars of different manufacturers using Balance of Performance,’ Eifrig continues. The so-called BoP, a classification rating for different vehicles in the new top classes, ensures a level playing field and thrilling racing.

Factors such as minimum weight, maximum revs per minute or energy per stint make the vehicles equivalent in terms of performance. ‘It’s quite challenging to reach this performance window,’ Eifrig adds. ‘At the same time, it’s about achieving the distinctive Porsche look. We had the difficult task of finding the perfect compromise between efficient aerodynamics and an immediately recognisable design language.’ For the ACO and FIA governing bodies to accept the so-called brand identity, it must also meet many other criteria. The Porsche 963 received immediate approval.

V8 turbo engine: A modern unit based on the Porsche RS Spyder

While the regulations specify that the hybrid components and the gearbox must be cost-efficient standardised components, it allows great leeway in choosing the combustion engine. In principle, the following applies: Power output is capped at 520 kW (707 PS) with the minimum weight set at 180 kilograms, including the periphery. In late 2020, Stefan Moser, the head engineer responsible for the Porsche 963 powertrain, and his 18-strong team opted for the 4.6-litre engine from the Porsche 918 Spyder.

This hybrid-powered sportscar debuted in early September 2013. Shortly before its premiere, it became the first production sports car to turn a sub-seven-minute lap of the Nürburgring-Nordschleife. Its powerful V8 offers excellent durability, enormous stiffness and dry sump lubrication. ‘The engine features a flat crankshaft and has a very short stroke,’ explains Moser. ‘This allowed us to mount it very low, which gives us a low centre of gravity and optimum linkage points for the suspension and gearbox. Although the engine was not a supporting element in the 918, its basic rigidity was relatively high – which also suits us very well.’

Porsche’s Previous Top Class Endurance Racer: The 919 LMP1 Hybrid

Powering the Porsche 918 Spyder is a highly efficient, naturally aspirated engine without turbocharging. In the LMDh prototype, the power unit runs in conjunction with two turbochargers from the Dutch manufacturer Van der Lee, which increases the ambient pressure by just 0.3 bars. The turbocharger units mount in a ‘hot vee’ configuration inside the 90-degree opening of the V-geometry. ‘The engine retains its basic characteristics as a naturally aspirated unit and has a swift throttle response,’ Moser continues. ‘The relatively low boost pressure builds quickly; therefore, there is no so-called turbo lag.’

Converting the production engine to feature turbo technology was easy: around 80 per cent of all components come from the 918, though some components required additional reinforcement to make the 963 engine a supporting element. Additionally, Porsche had already designed the V8 to work with a hybrid system for the 918 Spyder.

The manufacturers Bosch (motor generator unit, electronics and software) and Williams Advanced Engineering (high-voltage battery) supply the standardised components of the electric boost system. The so-called motor generator unit (MGU), responsible for the power output and energy recovery under braking at the rear axle, directly interacts with the standard gearbox from the Xtrac brand. The MGU sits in the bell housing between the combustion engine and the gearbox.

Porsche 9RD LMDh/GTP Prototype engine. Credit: Porsche

The hybrid’s entire electrical system produces up to 800 volts. The uniform battery has an energy capacity of 1.35 kWh, which can be mobilised at any time under acceleration. An output of 30 to 50 kW (40 to 68 PS) is available in short bursts but does not change the overall output of the powertrain. When the thrust of the MGU kicks in, the combustion engine’s power, which can reach over 8,000 rpm (depending on the BoP), automatically decreases. The regulations stipulate the power output precisely.

The lineage of the 4.6-litre twin-turbo V8 sporting the Porsche internal designation 9RD can be traced back to the RS Spyder. In the hands of the former Porsche customer team Penske, the racing vehicle won all titles in the LMP2 class of the American Le Mans Series between 2006 and 2008. At the time, the engine in the distinctive yellow and red prototype had a displacement of 3.4 litres. The design and concept, however, still satisfy the highest demands of modern motorsport.

‘The V8 engine can also run on CO2-optimised fuel or so-called bio-based refuel,’ Moser notes. In this area, Porsche has played a pioneering role with the introduction of environmentally friendly fuels in the Porsche Mobil 1 Supercup since the 2021 season. The insights gained with the 911 GT3 Cup assist with the optimum running of the new Porsche 963.

Porsche 963, Porsche Penske Motorsport (#6), Nick Tandy (UK), Mathieu Jaminet (F), Dane Cameron (USA). Credit: Porsche

Technical data: Porsche 963

Length: 5,100
Width: 2,000
Height: 1,060 mm
Wheelbase: 3,148 mm
Minimum weight: 1,030 kg
Top speed: >330 km/h

Technical data: 9RD engine

Type: V8
Displacement: 4,593 cc
Charging: 2 turbochargers
Cylinder bank angle: 90 degrees
Bore: 96 mm
Stroke: 81 mm
Output: > 515 kW (700 PS) RPM: > 8,000

ENDS

The post Porsche 963 LMDh/GTP Hybrid Prototype Technical Insight appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/porsche-963-lmdh-insight/feed/ 0
Interview: Adrian Newey’s Influence At Red Bull Racing https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/interview-adrian-neweys-influence-at-red-bull-racing/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/interview-adrian-neweys-influence-at-red-bull-racing/#respond Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:52:48 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=611067 Oracle Red Bull Racing's team principal Christian Horner and chief technical officer Adrian Newey sit down to reflect on their formidable F1 alliance.

The post Interview: Adrian Newey’s Influence At Red Bull Racing appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

In an interview with The 10 Group, Oracle Red Bull Racing’s two most senior figures reflected on the origins of their professional relationship, how working together for a common goal formed a bond, and how successes – plus the lean times in between – have shaped the team into a modern-day F1 powerhouse.

Christian Horner is the only Team Principal Oracle Red Bull Racing (ORBR) has ever had, playing an instrumental role in taking what he describes as a ‘party team’ to the lofty heights of winning 2022’s F1 Driver and Constructor Championship.

It’s been a long journey full of twists and turns since the team first competed in the world championship back in 2005 when a relatively green Horner was trying to turn an unproven team into serious competitors. Reflecting back on the period, Horner says it was clear to him what was needed, or more specifically who he needed: Adrian Newey.

Interview with Christian Horner and Adrian Newey

The post Interview: Adrian Newey’s Influence At Red Bull Racing appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/interview-adrian-neweys-influence-at-red-bull-racing/feed/ 0
Audi RS Q e-tron saves over 60% CO2 at the 2023 Dakar Rally https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/audi-rs-q-e-tron-saves-over-60-co2-at-the-2023-dakar-rally/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/audi-rs-q-e-tron-saves-over-60-co2-at-the-2023-dakar-rally/#respond Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:02:18 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=611032 New eFuel developed for the Audi RS Q e-tron is transforming the climate impact of Audi's motorsport campaigns.

The post Audi RS Q e-tron saves over 60% CO2 at the 2023 Dakar Rally appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
On its Dakar debut in January 2022, the Audi RS Q e-tron set standards for the efficiency and competitiveness of e-mobility in motorsport. Now the next step follows: The three desert prototypes with electric drive and energy converter will be at the start of the next edition of the Dakar Rally from December 31, 2022, to January 15, 2023, for the first time with an innovative fuel.

‘At Audi, we are pursuing a consistent strategy of decarbonization,’ says Oliver Hoffmann, Board Member for Technical Development at Audi. ‘Our battery vehicles and renewable electricity are the lead technologies. To complement this, renewable fuels offer the possibility of running internal combustion engines in a more climate-friendly way. The Audi RS Q e-tron combines both systems in its innovative drive. As a result, we are now even more sustainable on the road in the toughest motorsport imaginable for electric drives.”

Audi relies on residue-based products that do not compete with foodstuffs for the fuel used in the rally car to further reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Behind this is a process that converts biomass into ethanol in the first step. The final fuel is then produced in further process steps. The process is abbreviated to ethanol-to-gasoline (ETG). The process engineers use biogenic plant parts as the starting product. The tank content of the RS Q e-tron consists of 80% sustainable components, including ETG and e-methanol. This fuel is required by the energy converter, whose combustion engine part operates with high compression and thus very efficiently supplies electricity for the electric drive. So while the drive concept, in principle, already requires less fuel than conventional systems, there is now a further optimization. ‘With this fuel mixture, the Audi RS Q e-tron saves more than 60% in carbon dioxide emissions,” says Dr Fabian Titus, Application and Thermodynamics Development.

This development, driven by Audi, complies with the strict chemical specifications of the FIA and ASO fuel regulations. They are similar to the regulations for commercially available fuel grades with 102 octane. Such a high value guarantees the anti-knock properties of the fuel-air mix during the combustion process. With this innovative fuel, the combustion engine achieves slightly higher efficiency than fossil-based gasoline. However, the oxygen content in the eFuel reduces the energy density of the fuel, which is why the volumetric calorific value drops. The RS Q e-Tron, therefore, requires a larger tank volume.

Of course, this does not give the vehicle a regulatory advantage because fuel flow meters determine energy consumption with maximum precision in the interest of equal opportunities among the participants. In its premiere year, 2022, the first generation of the RS Q e-tron already completed the daily rally stages in January and March in a highly energy-efficient manner thanks to the electric drive with energy converter. A significantly improved CO2 balance is additionally achieved through the direct use of renewable fuels in HEV (Hybrid Electric Vehicles) models such as the RS Q e-tron and highly efficient hybrid vehicles for road traffic in general.

Audi’s vision is to drive the world’s most demanding races with 100% renewable fuel. After the four rings have stood for a technology transfer between motorsport and production cars for more than four decades, the use of eFuels opens up an additional dimension: vehicles with combustion engines and hybrid drives can continue to make an effective contribution to reducing greenhouse gases with eFuels.

The post Audi RS Q e-tron saves over 60% CO2 at the 2023 Dakar Rally appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/audi-rs-q-e-tron-saves-over-60-co2-at-the-2023-dakar-rally/feed/ 0
What is the Future of Sportscars? | Inside Track with John Hindhaugh https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/what-is-the-future-of-sportscars-inside-track-with-john-hindhaugh/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/what-is-the-future-of-sportscars-inside-track-with-john-hindhaugh/#respond Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:19:43 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=610913 The post What is the Future of Sportscars? | Inside Track with John Hindhaugh appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

Hagerty Media is a media platform aimed to illuminate the joy of driving, the wonder of mechanical components, and the bond drivers share with their machines. It fuels the automotive enthusiast — reporting the car stories that matter most, providing exclusive market insights, and igniting conversation. Hagerty Media Inside Track and Radio Le Mans’ host John Hindhaugh teamed up with Racecar Engineering’s Andrew Cotton and Sportscar365’s John Dagys for an episode on what’s to come in the new prototype sportscar racing world. Check out the conversation here!

Future of Sportscars | Inside Track with John Hindhaugh

ENDS

The post What is the Future of Sportscars? | Inside Track with John Hindhaugh appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/what-is-the-future-of-sportscars-inside-track-with-john-hindhaugh/feed/ 0
Tech Explained: Formula 1 MGU-H https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/tech-explained-formula-1-mgu-h/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/tech-explained-formula-1-mgu-h/#respond Thu, 06 Oct 2022 16:21:22 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=610879 Mercedes HPP's Hywel Thomas explains the functionality and design of the Mercedes W13 power unit's heat energy recovery system, MGU-H.

The post Tech Explained: Formula 1 MGU-H appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

One of the most effective performance-differentiating systems onboard the Formula 1 power unit is the turbocharger shaft-mounted heat energy recovery system (MGU-H). The MGU-H uses exhaust gas entropy (the heat energy remaining in the exhaust gas as a function of its temperature, expansion, and mass flow rate) to spin the turbine during the energy recovery phase converting the energy from the exhaust gases into electrical energy.

The electrical energy is then used to power the car’s electrical driveline (either charging the battery or directly deploying to the kinetic energy recovery unit) to boost the power unit’s performance. Being a motor, if electrical energy is supplied, it will drive, and if it is being rotated inside the magnetic field, it will create electrical power.

The MGU-H is an area of the regulations which isn’t heavily tied down. It must be a minimum of four kilogrammes, but in terms of the energy and the power, it’s allowed to have as much as the teams can extract. The FIA left this freedom to encourage manufacturers to use it well and aid power unit efficiency. In Formula 1 power units, the MGU-H is part of the turbocharger assembly.

As seen in the video below, Mercedes AMG HPP’s managing director, Hywel Thomas, explains that their MGU-H sits between the compressor and the turbine. The whole assembly is then fitted into the centre of the vee of the 1.6-litre V6 internal combustion engine. Thomas goes on to explain how the MGU-H interacts with a large number of other parts in the power unit, especially with the turbocharger.

During energy recovery, the electrical energy produced from the MGU-H can go into the battery to be stored for later use or directly from the MGU-H to the kinetic energy recovery system (MGU-K) to increase the power unit output. When used as a motor, the MGU-H solves the problem of turbo lag. It spins the turbocharger when there isn’t enough entropy in the exhaust gas at the right time to ensure that the power unit delivers available peak performance in the given condition.

The primary driver for the introduction of the MGU-H was the motivation of the FIA to have very power-dense power units in Formula 1 by increasing the brake thermal efficiency and, therefore, improving the performance. The MGU-H system will not be available in the next generation of Formula 1 power units. As such, teams will have to find other ways to maintain and improve the power unit efficiency under the new regime.

MGU-H Explained

ENDS

The post Tech Explained: Formula 1 MGU-H appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/tech-explained-formula-1-mgu-h/feed/ 0
Case Study: McLaren and Stratasys’ Neo800 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/case-study-mclaren-and-stratasys-neo800/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/case-study-mclaren-and-stratasys-neo800/#respond Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:01:25 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=610804 By bringing more production in-house and compressing development cycles, Stratasys' Neo800 stereolithography 3D printers enable McLaren Racing to make up to 9,000 parts per year, helping them make the most of stricter design windows and cost controls set by the FIA.

The post Case Study: McLaren and Stratasys’ Neo800 appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

The ‘formula’ behind Formula One is a series of complex rules and regulations that must be adhered to by the competing drivers and teams. The rules frame a technological window within which each team produces a car, all within a maximum permissible budget. The regulations create a fiercely competitive landscape where fractions of a gram here, a micron or two there, and the overarching speed of development separate podium finishers from the ‘also rans’. To help excel in this harsh competitive environment, McLaren deploys Stratasys‘ stereolithography 3D printing technology through a suite of five Neo®800 3D printers — producing full-size aerodynamic surfaces to high-accuracy embedded sensor housings — to chase the ideal design for the road ahead.

Formula One is synonymous with aerodynamics. While computer-aided design (CAD) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are keys to the design and development of a Formula One car, wind tunnel testing is still the gold standard when assessing how every surface works together, either as an assembly or as a complete car. McLaren uses only the FIA permissible 60% scale models of parts in its wind tunnels to optimise the aerodynamic package and find more downforce – which provides more aerodynamic grip – and balance the front and rear aerodynamic loads on the car.

PerFORM Reflect was developed specifically for wind tunnel models. It creates strong, stiff parts that, when combined with the surface finish achieved by the Neo800, can reduce post-processing by more than 30%. Using Stratasys Neo800 3D printers and Somos® PerFORM Reflect resin material, the team produces thousands of parts for numerous front and rear wing programs and large parts of the side bodywork. The parts combine with a machined aluminium spine to make the final wind tunnel ready scale model. Wind tunnel testing will regularly see multiple iterations of front and rear wing designs, sidepods (including large swathes of bodywork to the rear of the sidepods themselves) and the complete top-body of the car.

Tim Chapman, Head of Additive Manufacturing at McLaren Racing, explains: ‘Our new Neo series of 3D printers have dramatically helped to reduce the lead times of our aerodynamic wind tunnel components and projects. The large bed size of the Neo800 allows very large parts to be built quickly and to a very high level of detail, definition, and repeatability. We find the high-definition components from our Neo machines require minimal hand finishing, which allows much faster throughput to the wind tunnel. Finishing cycle times have also been reduced dramatically.’

The process for creating a 60% scale top-body from start to finish is also now much faster. With its stereolithography 3D printers, the McLaren team can turn a top-body project around — from receiving the CAD data to delivery of the finished part — in just 3 to 4 days. ‘Previously, to produce a 60% scale top-body, we would have first glued up the tooling block and rough machined this to the approximate top-body shape,’ says Chapman.’ Then, using hand-shaped templates from a technical drawing, we would have hand-finished the top-body shape, effectively creating a pattern, before shuttering up the edges and taking a carbon mould from this pattern.

‘Once the carbon mould had been autoclaved and removed from the pattern, the actual carbon component (i.e., the model scale top-body surface) would then be laid up in the mould and autoclaved again. Once removed from the mould, this component would form the top body for the scale model Formula One car. In contrast, the Neo800s allow us to completely sidestep that tooling and carbon fibre manufacturing process and 3D print the modular parts instead.’

Around 60 air pressure housings are embedded within McLaren’s car to enable air pressure readings of the various surfaces. This information is then fed back to the race engineers to aid development. The small pressure tapping running through these components requires a highly accurate and high-definition 3D printing process. After post-processing, these parts are integrated directly into the car. The large bed size of the Stratasys Neo800 3D printers (800 x 800 x 600 mm) allows for producing either large single parts or many smaller ones. The process means intricate details are always preserved with industry-leading repeatability and reliability.

Mclaren tries to manufacture in-house wherever possible. McLaren’s Technical Partnership with Stratasys has been instrumental in reducing the cost and time to manufacture components. With the FIA deciding to bring the budget cap down from $175 million to $145 million for its first year of operation in 2021, then down to $140 million for 2022 and $135 million in 2023, this significantly focuses teams on the efficiency of the design to production processes.

With the Neo800 3D printers, McLaren can now manufacture all aerodynamic wind tunnel models at its base in Woking, UK, saving subcontractors and the associated quality assurance costs. The team can also 3D print jigs, templates, and small moulds that would have previously been machined from metal billets. Not only does the speed of the Neo800 stereolithography process save considerable time, but it also saves on costly metal material by not wasting large amounts of swarf removed from the subtractive machining process.

As stereolithography 3D printing technology and materials have evolved, so have the ways in which McLaren exploits the technology. While wind tunnel models and prototypes are still crucial use cases, the team also produces a lot of full-scale components and production tooling. This improved speed and the lower cost make it easier to run a responsive feedback loop where the team can produce new iterations in response to design issues at any point in the season.

For example, using Somos DMX SL-100 resin with the Stratasys Neo800 3D printers, the team is printing sacrificial tooling to allow composite lay-up over the mould. Then, through a unique extraction process, the resin is removed after autoclaving leaving the cured composite part ready for use. This process allows designers to quickly realise hollow or convoluted composite parts without needing costly and time-consuming complex moulds and core manufacturing.

‘The Neo800 is very much at the heart of our vehicle development process – from design to production,’ continues Chapman. ‘We tend to make four car sets of most components before the next iteration is released, which supersedes the previous version. That is why 3D printing is so good for many components; you can make parts extremely quickly and remove the need for tooling and moulds. That is vital in Formula One, with super tight deadlines to deliver cars to the next race. The smallest design iteration can make all the difference between winning, losing or making up positions on the grid.’

ENDS

The post Case Study: McLaren and Stratasys’ Neo800 appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/case-study-mclaren-and-stratasys-neo800/feed/ 0
Multimatic Motorsports Tests at ARP’s Catesby Tunnel https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/multimatic-motorsports-tests-at-arps-catesby-tunnel/ https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/multimatic-motorsports-tests-at-arps-catesby-tunnel/#respond Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:38:24 +0000 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=610793 Multimatic Motorsports has completed an initial aerodynamic evaluation test of its Mazda DPi at ARP's 2.7km Catesby Tunnel.

The post Multimatic Motorsports Tests at ARP’s Catesby Tunnel appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>

Multimatic Motorsports has completed an initial aerodynamic evaluation test at Catesby Tunnel, a newly-opened aerodynamic testing facility owned by ARP (Aero Research Partners). It is the first facility of its kind in the UK and only the second in the world.

The team ran its Mazda DPi race car up to 120mph through the tunnel, measuring its aerodynamic behaviour. The team compared the results to a comprehensive data set previously gathered from 40% scale and full-size wind tunnel testing, Computational Fluid Dynamics development and five years of competition in IMSA’s top-level championship. It found a high correlation to the existing performance data.

The Catesby facility began its life as a dual rail Victorian railway tunnel, with the first steam locomotives running through it in July 1898. It closed to trains in 1966. A multi-million-pound transformation has turned Catesby into a state-of-the-art aerodynamic vehicle testing facility. The tunnel still carries vestiges of soot from coal-burning trains, which has stuck to many of the approximately 30 million bricks required to construct the perfectly straight 2.7 km long tunnel, boasting a massive cross-section, 8.2m wide and 7.8m high.

Catesby Tunnel turns the traditional practice of using a wind tunnel on its head; as Multimatic Motorsports boss, Larry Holt, explains, ‘Compared to conventional wind tunnels, this is better because it’s real. In a moving ground plane wind tunnel, the car is stationary, the wind is blown over it by a massive fan and flow conditioning set-up, and a belt is arranged to move under the car at a coordinated speed. It’s a very sophisticated configuration, but the car is still stationary. Catesby facilitates measuring the aerodynamic performance of a vehicle moving through the air.’

‘The car is subjected to influences like gusting wind, rain and other changing environmental conditions that affect air density; all of the variables that come with driving in the real world. Catesby provides the real world without the weather. You have a moving car, a road surface, a controlled environment, and we can run 24 hours a day, whatever the season – it is a perfect 2.7kms of controlled atmosphere. That’s the kind of consistency you need when you are chasing incremental gains.’

Multimatic driver, Andy Priaulx, was behind the wheel of the Mazda RT24-P throughout the test. He commented, ‘When you’ve been a racing driver for as long as I have, you don’t often get to experience anything new. ‘When it comes to pure aerodynamic testing, I’m used to engineers studying static car models in wind tunnels with no driver involvement. At the start, jumping into a race car and driving flat out through a 2.7km tunnel felt odd, but the team assured me that the end was very clearly marked! Catesby Tunnel is an incredible facility, and it doesn’t surprise me at all to know that Multimatic chose to be an early adopter and primary client of the facility.’

Located just a few miles from Daventry in rural Northamptonshire, Catesby Tunnel situates in the UK’s Motorsport Valley. It is just a short drive from Multimatic Motorsports’ UK headquarters in Brackley. Holt understood the advantage of the tunnel before it was completed and has locked down a significant amount of Catesby’s available tunnel time for the development of future race, road and track-day cars created by Multimatic Special Vehicle Operations.

Aerodynamic testing at Catesby Tunnel

ENDS

The post Multimatic Motorsports Tests at ARP’s Catesby Tunnel appeared first on Racecar Engineering.

]]>
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/multimatic-motorsports-tests-at-arps-catesby-tunnel/feed/ 0